Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.

نویسندگان

  • M J Gardner
  • D G Altman
چکیده

Overemphasis on hypothesis testing--and the use of P values to dichotomise significant or non-significant results--has detracted from more useful approaches to interpreting study results, such as estimation and confidence intervals. In medical studies investigators are usually interested in determining the size of difference of a measured outcome between groups, rather than a simple indication of whether or not it is statistically significant. Confidence intervals present a range of values, on the basis of the sample data, in which the population value for such a difference may lie. Some methods of calculating confidence intervals for means and differences between means are given, with similar information for proportions. The paper also gives suggestions for graphical display. Confidence intervals, if appropriate to the type of study, should be used for major findings in both the main text of a paper and its abstract.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Measuring Hospital Performance Using Mortality Rates: An Alternative to the RAMR

Background The risk-adjusted mortality rate (RAMR) is used widely by healthcare agencies to evaluate hospital performance. The RAMR is insensitive to case volume and requires a confidence interval for proper interpretation, which results in a hypothesis testing framework. Unfamiliarity with hypothesis testing can lead to erroneous interpretations by the public and other stakeholders. We argue t...

متن کامل

In defense of P values.

Statistical hypothesis testing has been widely criticized by ecologists in recent years. I review some of the more persistent criticisms of P values and argue that most stem from misunderstandings or incorrect interpretations, rather than from intrinsic shortcomings of the P value. I show that P values are intimately linked to confidence intervals and to differences in Akaike's information crit...

متن کامل

Reporting Results of Orthopaedic Research: Confidence Intervals and p Values

The paper of Vavken et al. published in this issue of Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research [7] underscores the low frequency of reporting confidence intervals in orthopaedic research as opposed to reporting p values, despite recommendations in the medical literature to report the former [3– 6]. One possible reason for the investigators favoring statistical testing (ie, p values) over conf...

متن کامل

Sample size considerations for superiority trials in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

For reasons of efficiency and ethics, sample size calculations are an important part of the design of all clinical trials. This paper highlights the statistical issues inherent to the estimation of sample size requirements in superiority trials particular to SLE. Calculations based on statistical power for testing hypotheses have historically been the method of choice for sample size determinat...

متن کامل

A farewell to P-values?

A recent paper in the medical literature by Sterne and Davey-Smith has focused attention on some of the problems of interpretation of significance/hypothesis tests; in particular, the meaning and status of P-values associated with these tests. What were these concerns: that the division of results into “significant” and “nonsignificant” according to a P-value = 0.05 was arbitrary and not in acc...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • British medical journal

دوره 292 6522  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1986